President Donald Trump has threatened to impose a 25% tariff on iPhones and other Apple products manufactured in China, escalating trade tensions with Beijing. The announcement, made today, May 23, 2025, targets Apple’s chief executive, Tim Cook, and underscores Trump’s broader strategy to pressure U.S. companies to relocate manufacturing to American soil.
The proposed tariffs could significantly impact Apple’s supply chain, consumer prices, and the global tech market, while reigniting debates over protectionism and economic nationalism.
According to a report by the Financial Times, Trump’s tariff threat is part of a broader push to address the U.S. trade deficit with China and bolster domestic manufacturing. The president has long criticised American companies for outsourcing production, arguing that it undermines U.S. workers and economic sovereignty. Apple, which assembles the majority of its iPhones in China through partners like Foxconn, has been a frequent target of Trump’s rhetoric.
In a statement posted on X, Trump reiterated his stance, saying, “Apple must bring jobs back to America, or they’ll face the consequences of high tariffs. We’re making America great again!”
The proposed 25% tariff would apply to iPhones, iPads, MacBooks, and other Apple products made in China, potentially increasing costs for consumers. Analysts estimate that such a tariff could raise the price of an iPhone by $100 to $200, depending on the model.
This comes at a time when Apple is already navigating global supply chain challenges, including disruptions caused by geopolitical tensions and rising production costs. The company has diversified its manufacturing base in recent years, expanding operations in India and Vietnam, but China remains its primary production hub.

Industry experts warn that the tariffs could disrupt Apple’s carefully calibrated supply chain.
“Apple’s ecosystem relies on precision and scale, which China’s manufacturing infrastructure provides,” said Sarah Lin, a tech analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. “A 25% tariff would force Apple to either absorb the costs, which would hurt margins, or pass them on to consumers, risking demand.”
Lin noted that relocating production to the U.S. is not a simple fix, as it would require significant investment in infrastructure and a skilled workforce, which could take years to develop.
Trump’s 25% tariff threat on Apple signals a renewed hostility against China
The timing of Trump’s announcement coincides with heightened U.S.-China trade tensions. The Biden administration had previously imposed tariffs on Chinese goods, but Trump’s latest move signals a more aggressive approach. In addition to Apple, the president has floated tariffs on other tech giants and industries reliant on Chinese manufacturing.
This aligns with his campaign promises to prioritise American jobs and reduce dependence on foreign supply chains. However, critics argue that such measures could backfire, leading to higher prices, supply shortages, and strained relations with key trading partners.
Apple has not issued an official response to the tariff threat, but Tim Cook has previously engaged with Trump on trade issues. During Trump’s first term, Cook successfully lobbied for exemptions from certain tariffs, emphasising Apple’s contributions to the U.S. economy through job creation and innovation.
In 2019, Apple employed over 2 million people indirectly through its U.S.-based app economy and retail operations. However, Trump’s renewed focus on tariffs suggests that Cook may face a tougher negotiation this time.
The broader implications of the tariff threat extend beyond Apple. The Consumer Technology Association (CTA) warned that tariffs could lead to a “tech tax” on American consumers, estimating that a 25% tariff on imported electronics could cost U.S. households $80 billion annually.
“Tariffs are a blunt instrument that often hurt the very people they’re meant to protect,” CTA president Gary Shapiro said in a statement.
Small businesses and startups, which rely on affordable tech products, could also face challenges if prices rise.


The tariff threat has raised questions about Apple’s long-term strategy. The company has already begun diversifying its supply chain, with plans to produce 25% of its iPhones in India by 2027. However, scaling up production outside China is a complex process, requiring coordination with suppliers, governments, and labour markets. Apple’s investments in India have been bolstered by government incentives, but replicating China’s manufacturing ecosystem remains a significant challenge.
As the situation unfolds, all eyes are on Apple’s next steps. Will the company accelerate its diversification efforts, negotiate with the Trump administration, or pass costs onto consumers? The outcome could set a precedent for how other tech giants navigate the shifting landscape of U.S. trade policy. For now, the threat of a 25% tariff looms large, casting uncertainty over one of the world’s most valuable companies and the millions of consumers who rely on its products.